Group Communications Essay Essay Example

Group Communications Essay Essay Example Group Communications Essay Essay Group Communications Essay Essay Three pictures of different group and squad interaction will be reviewed for this paper. After they have been viewed they will be discussed on affairs of the relationship between group members. member diverseness and communicating manner. The first instance survey to be reviewed is: Helping Annie. In this picture a school nurse has called a meeting with a head-shrinker and a societal worker to discourse the instance of a High school pupil. Annie. who perchance suffers from depression and an eating upset. Right off the chiropteran the school nurse is interrupted by the head-shrinker before she can complete giving the background information on Annie. He wants facts instantly non â€Å"impressions. † He makes a speedy determination as to her job and her intervention within proceedingss of their meeting and seems to believe that they are done. no more demands to be said. : The Social worker does non hold with his determination and offers a counter solution but is once more interrupted by the head-shrinker. The head-shrinker wants to utilize medicine and the Social workers wants to first talk to Annie and see if they can understand what the adolescent is traveling through. The head-shrinker sees this as a entire waste of clip. There does non look to be any existent facilitator of these meeting. and no one points out the psychiatrist’s changeless breaks of the societal worker but the societal worker herself. The school nurse is wholly intimidated into silence by both of their behaviours. The psychologist seems to hold the communicating traits of what the trial calls minds. and the Social worker has the traits of a antenna. Harmonizing to the text. Thinks are task-oriented. They take pride in their ability to believe objectively and logically. regardless of if those ideas are right. ( Reeve. 2007. Ch. 3. pg. 69. parity. 2 ) Antennas are people-oriented. The psychologist is really direct and analytical. He seems to desire to take any feelings or humanity from Annie’s instance while the societal worker is taking a more subjective. humane attack to Annie’s jobs and is evidently more concerned with the girl’s wellbeing than a speedy hole. The diverseness that exists in this group is both gender and category. The group consist of two adult females and one older adult male. the older adult male. the head-shrinker. seems to believe that the societal worker and school nurse are non in the same category as he. his age. experience and profession doing him superior to them on all degrees. hence. their sentiments are non deserving sing. This diverseness is a hinderance in their communicating because the psychologist is non listening to the two adult females and continues to disrupt them because â€Å"he doesn’t have much clip here. † If utilizing a high context perspective the spectator could pull the decision that the psychologist does non hold with the societal worker by watching his gestural behaviour such as his gestures and facial looks. In a high-context civilization small significance is expressed through words. Meaning can be conveyed through position such as age. gender. instruction or rubric. ( Reeve. 2007 ) One method that could hold been used to better communications would hold been to hold a facilitator nowadays to guarantee that each party had the same sum of clip to show his or her sentiments. Another betterment would hold been a alteration of puting from the informal scene to a more professional seating agreement that may hold helped foster communicating between all parties present. such as a unit of ammunition tabular array or face to confront seating. The 2nd picture reviewed is: Planing the Playground. The group consists of three males and two females ; three Caucasians and two minorities. The picture instance opens with two new members. one a younger male. Ray and one older adult female. Betty. run intoing the squad for the first clip. There seems to be two somewhat awkward minutes when Ray foremost merely offers to agitate the custodies of the work forces at the tabular array and when he has problem articulating the name of the minority female Iesha. The minute was defused rapidly when Iesha decided to do a little gag about her name to ease the tenseness and held out her ain manus in salutation. Betty seemed unsure about speech production and said she merely joined the squad to do friends. Communicationss between the squad started out stiff and decelerate but by utilizing â€Å"team talk. † ( the nature of the linguistic communication that group members use as they work together. Not merely does squad speak enable group members to portion information and express sentiments. but analysis of squad talk besides â€Å"reveals where the squad is coming from and where the squad is headed. ) ( Reeve. 2007. Ch. 5 pg. 124. Para. 2 ) . squad leader David kept the treatment fluxing and moved it to the ground they were at that place. The function the diverseness of the group played in their communicating was the different experiences each had to convey to the treatment. Iesha evidently liked research and set Numberss and offered non merely a sound dollar sum to endeavor for but concluding behind it. Ray countered that he thinks the sum should be higher but offered no existent ground as did Phil who wanted the sum lower. After make up ones minding to compromise they moved to fund-raising. The immediate response to Betty’s suggestion of holding a Bake sale was obvious. They did non take her input earnestly at all but once more the squad leader chimed in before thei r dismissive attitude could be considered ill-mannered and contemptuous. Diversity was besides non a strong hinderance to the group even though the potency was at that place. Conflict direction techniques were used by the group by showing involvement in work outing the job and maintaining their tone and linguistic communication non-threatening. utilizing phrases like â€Å"well. yes but let’s expression at it from a different angle† or â€Å"that’s a good thought but may non be precisely what we need now. †The usage of squad speak was a really effectual communicating tool that kept the squad focused and on path. Another of import tool that was used was gestural. The seating agreement at the tabular array permitted members to hold their personal infinite but still be able to hold direct oculus contact. Harmonizing to Reeve. each person’s pick of siting place in groups has a direct consequence on interaction and influence. A figure of surveies have demonstrated that group members prefercorner-to-corner or side-by-side seating for concerted activities. Such an agreement allows them to be near adequate to portion stuffs. ( R eeve. 2007. CH. 5 pg. 138. Para 1 ) The squad in this instance survey did demo good communicating accomplishments on the whole but the one betterment would hold been to guarantee that before the meeting took topographic point. that each member understood what the ground for the meeting was. The last picture reviewed is Virtual Communication. This picture is a presentation of three people run intoing as a squad via conference call. The 3rd unobserved member is non listening to what is being said by the director or his coworker. This is obvious because when they ask him a inquiry he pauses or stammers. so repeats something that neither of the other participants really said. Listening is of import in any group so that you can be certain to acquire all the available information every bit good as know precisely what is expected of you. This is even more so in the practical concern work when squad members are non really sitting face to face. Charlie is neither listening to what is being said or to the messages that were contained in Ellen’s electronic mail or voice mails to him. Harmonizing to the text. Effective hearing in practical groups requires accommodating to a different medium of look Your lone version is doing certain that your mike is on or off at appropriate times. In an email treatment. nevertheless. you can neither see nor hear participants. but you still must â€Å"listen† to their messages. ( Reeve. 2007. Ch. 6. Pg. . 168 ) The disadvantage of group meetings utilizing a practical medium is that you can forge hearing by replying â€Å"I agree† or a non-committal sound. You can besides feign you didn’t hear something that you don’t want to turn to as Ellen does in this picture when Charlie tries to put the incrimination on her. Charlie did non efficaciously use any of his listening accomplishments while on this call. It was evident by his distrait â€Å"non-answers† that he was non listening. The full mistake is non needfully Charlie’s ; it is non known if he of all time to the full understood what was expected of him from the first meeting. If he had at any clip used one listening accomplishment such as rephrasing he might hold had adequate elucidation to acquire his assignment done in clip. Paraphrasing is a signifier of feedback that one lets the talker know you are listening and gives them the chance to clear up their statement. Paraphrasing can be used for multiple intents such as: To guarantee comprehension before rating ; to reassure others that you want to understand them ; to unclutter up confusion and ask for elucidation ; and to assist other’s make their ain decisions. ( Reeve. 2007 ) Mentions Engleberg. I. Wynn. D. 2007. Working in Groups: Communication Principles and Strategies ( 4th ed. ) Allyn A ; Bacon Publishers. The Collaboration Tool Box. 2002-2003. MIT. Online resource. Retreived on-line January 12. 2009 from hypertext transfer protocol: //web. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. e